Skip to main content

No Section 234A Interest on SA tax paid before due date of filing ROI

By

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT)
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO. 2/2015, Dated: February 10, 2015

Subject: Chargeability of Interest under Section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on self-assessment tax paid before the due date of filing of return of income-regarding

 

Interest under Section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) is charged in case of default in furnishing return of income by an assessee. The interest is charged at the specified rate on the amount of tax payable on the total income, as reduced by the amount of advance tax, TDS/TCS, any relief of tax allowed under section 90 and section 90A, any deduction allowed under section 91 and any tax credit allowed in accordance with the provisions of section 115JAA and section 115JD of the Act. Since self-assessment tax is not mentioned as a component of tax to be reduced from the amount on which interest under section 234A of the Act is chargeable, interest is being charged on the amount of self-assessment tax paid by the assessee even before the due date of filing of return.

2. It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs Prannoy Roy, 309 ITR 231 (2009)  that the interest under section 234A of the Act on default in furnishing return of income shall be payable only on the amount of tax that has not been deposited before the due date of filing of the income-tax return for the relevant assessment year. Accordingly, the present practice of charging interest under section 234A of the Act on self-assessment tax paid before the due date of filing return was reviewed by CBDT.

3. The Board has decided that no interest under section 234A of the Act is chargeable on the amount of self-assessment tax paid by the assessee before the due date of filing of return of income.

4. This Circular may be brought to the notice of all officers for compliance.

5. Hindi version shall follow.

F. No. 385/03/2015-IT(B


--

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CBDT Instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014

By
Dear Members,   The Hon'ble CBDT has issued Instruction No 5/2014 dated  10.07.2014 , by which the monetary limits for filing appeals to ITAT / HIGH COURT / SUPREME COURT have been revised.   The New limits are:                                  Tax effect Appeal before ITAT                                Rs.  4,00,000/- High Court                                               Rs. 10,00,000/- Supreme Court                                        Rs. 25,00,000/-   Copy of Instruction is attached for your information.
Post a Comment
Read more

GST - Electronic invoicing (E Invoicing) made mandatory

By
E-invoice has been made mandatory for taxpayers having turnover exceeding 10 crores from 1st October, 2022: Notification 17/2022 Central Tax dtd 01/08/2022 It implies that any registered person whose aggregate turnover in any preceding financial year from FY 2017-18 onwards has exceeded Rs 10 Crore shall issue E-invoice w.e.f 1st October 2022 . -- CA Yashu Goel 9899263490 M/s N.K. Goel & Bros. Chartered Accountants www.TaxingNarad.COM
Post a Comment
Read more

S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines

By
Crystal Phosphates Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines  For AY 2006-07, the assessee filed a ROI declaring income of Rs. 3.97 crore. ·          The case was selected for scrutiny under clause 2(v)(b) of the Scrutiny Guidelines issued by the CBDT. ·          The said clause of the Scrutiny Guidelines provided that a case had to be selected for compulsory scrutiny if an addition/ disallowance of Rs. 5 lacs or more was pending in appeal before the CIT(A) and such identical issue also originated in the year under consideration. The assessee claimed that as this condition stipulated in the Scrutiny Guidelines was not satisfied, the AO had no jurisdiction to select the case for scrutiny . The AO & CIT(A) rejected the claim . On appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal, HELD allowing the appeal : The CBDT’s instructions ...
Post a Comment
Read more