Skip to main content

Fwd: Delhi VAT Tribunal - Division Bench - M/s JSW Steels Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Taxes, Delhi..

By
Respected Members,
Greetings for the day,

This is for your information please:

Please find attached herewith the Judgement of Delhi VAT Tribunal- Division Bench in case of  M/s JSW Steels Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Taxes, Delhi.

Date of Judgement -- 28-01-2016.

  

Truck was intercepted on Mathura Road, near Ashram by VATO , Ward 89 and on the basis of the Statement of the Driver of the Truck, Tax and Penalty was imposed U/s 86(19).

 

Tax & Penalty imposed by the Ld. VATO and upheld by the LD. OHA is hereby quashed and set aside and appeals are allowed.

 

The Tax and penalty which have deposited by the Appellant , are ordered to be adjusted as the advance tax against the future liability of the appellant.


25 VSTI 2016 C-83


--
N.K. Goel & Bros.
Chartered Accountants
CA Yashu Goel
9899263490

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CBDT Instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014

By
Dear Members,   The Hon'ble CBDT has issued Instruction No 5/2014 dated  10.07.2014 , by which the monetary limits for filing appeals to ITAT / HIGH COURT / SUPREME COURT have been revised.   The New limits are:                                  Tax effect Appeal before ITAT                                Rs.  4,00,000/- High Court                                               Rs. 10,00,000/- Supreme Court                                        Rs. 25,00,000/-   Copy of Instruction is attached for your information.
Post a Comment
Read more

GST - Electronic invoicing (E Invoicing) made mandatory

By
E-invoice has been made mandatory for taxpayers having turnover exceeding 10 crores from 1st October, 2022: Notification 17/2022 Central Tax dtd 01/08/2022 It implies that any registered person whose aggregate turnover in any preceding financial year from FY 2017-18 onwards has exceeded Rs 10 Crore shall issue E-invoice w.e.f 1st October 2022 . -- CA Yashu Goel 9899263490 M/s N.K. Goel & Bros. Chartered Accountants www.TaxingNarad.COM
Post a Comment
Read more

S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines

By
Crystal Phosphates Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines  For AY 2006-07, the assessee filed a ROI declaring income of Rs. 3.97 crore. ·          The case was selected for scrutiny under clause 2(v)(b) of the Scrutiny Guidelines issued by the CBDT. ·          The said clause of the Scrutiny Guidelines provided that a case had to be selected for compulsory scrutiny if an addition/ disallowance of Rs. 5 lacs or more was pending in appeal before the CIT(A) and such identical issue also originated in the year under consideration. The assessee claimed that as this condition stipulated in the Scrutiny Guidelines was not satisfied, the AO had no jurisdiction to select the case for scrutiny . The AO & CIT(A) rejected the claim . On appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal, HELD allowing the appeal : The CBDT’s instructions ...
Post a Comment
Read more