Skip to main content

Delhi HC Allows Import of Goods without payment of IGST to the extent of Advance Authorization obtained before GST Rollout

In a significant ruling,

Justices S Muralidhar and Prathba M Singh have granted an interim relief to the petitioners to import goods without payment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) to the extent of advance authorization scrip obtained by them prior to July 1st.

The order would be a major relief to the exporters who are under a threat of losing working capital on a daily basis due to the payment of IGST post implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST).

The petitioner, in the instant case was granted with Advance Authorization as per the Foreign Trade Policy 2015 – 2020.In terms with the FTP, the Advance Authorization licence is issued to a manufacturer exporter or merchant exporter having past export performance in at least two preceding financial years. The petitioners were aggrieved with the Notification No. 26/2017-Customs dated 29th June 2017, issued by the Government post GST regime, wherein an additional levy of IGST was made for imports made after 1 st July 2017.

The grievance of the Petitioner is that it holds export orders placed on it prior to 1st July 2017 for the fulfilment of which it has to undertake imports of inputs. According to them, with the change brought about by the GST regime, the Petitioner would have no option but to pay IGST out of its sources causing a working capital blockage. The Petitioner would have to rely upon borrowings as it has already exhausted its overdraft limits with the banks.

The prospect of the IGST being ultimately refunded some time in future is of little consolation to the Petitioner who seeks liquidity to discharge the additional levy of IGST failing which its imports will get blocked. It is in this factual background, the petitioners impugned the applicability of levy of IGST even to imports that are made for fulfilment of export orders that have been placed on and accepted by the Petitioner prior to 1st July, 2017. Also, the Petitioner is seeking to only avail the credit outstanding in respect of advance authorizations issued to the Petitioner prior to 1st July 2017.

The Court, being satisfied that there is prima facie case in the petitioners case, directed the Government to allow the Petitioner to continue making the imports under the Advance Authorization licenses issued prior to 1st July, 2017 in terms of their quantity and value subject to terms. Accordingly, it made the following directions. The Petitioner will be permitted to clear the consignments of imports constituting inputs for the fulfilment of its export orders placed on it prior to 1st July 2017 without any additional levies, and subject to the quantity and value as specified in the advance authorization licenses issued to it prior to 1st July 2017.

The above clearance would be subject to

(a) verification by the Customs Department that it is in conformity with the quantity and value as mentioned in the Advance Authorization license and

(b) ensuring that the extent of credit is available vis-a-vis such Advance Authorization licenses issued prior to 1st July 2017.

The above interim direction is further subject to the Petitioner furnishing an undertaking by way of an affidavit filed in this Court within one week from today to the effect that in the case of the Petitioner ultimately not succeeding in this writ petition, or failing to fulfil its export obligations, it is liable to pay the entire IGST as was leviable, together with whatever interest as the Court may determine at the time of final disposal of the writ petition.

The Petitioner will furnish to the Customs Department the entire list of its Advance Authorizations that are valid as on 1st July 2017 and a list of the export orders placed on the Petitioner prior to 1st July 2017. It is made clear that the above interim direction will only apply to those imports which are made by the Petitioner for fulfilment of its export orders placed with it prior to 1st July 2017 and not to any export order thereafter.

Source : http://www.taxscan.in/delhi-hc-allows-import-goods-without-payment-igst-extent-advance-authorization-obtained-gst-rollout/11040/


--
N.K. Goel & Bros.
Chartered Accountants
CA Yashu Goel
9899263490

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBDT Instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014

Dear Members,   The Hon'ble CBDT has issued Instruction No 5/2014 dated  10.07.2014 , by which the monetary limits for filing appeals to ITAT / HIGH COURT / SUPREME COURT have been revised.   The New limits are:                                  Tax effect Appeal before ITAT                                Rs.  4,00,000/- High Court                                               Rs. 10,00,000/- Supreme Court                                        Rs. 25,00,000/-   Copy of Instruction is attached for your information.

DVAT – Form T 2 form when to fill, what to do?

DVAT – Form T 2 form when to fill, what to do? The Trade and Taxes Department Delhi has issued a notification dtd. 17/05/2013 clarifying the requirements with regard to Form - T2 applicable to Purchasers/ Importers/ Dealers who are receiving goods from outside Delhi. Applicable to Whom Dealers having GTO more than or equal to Rs. 10 crores in the FY 2011-12. Exemption Dealers dealing exclusively in Tax Free Goods need not file T2. What if the turnover was not 10 crore in 2011-12 but exceeds limit in any subsequent year? T-2 shall become applicable from such subsequent year in which T/o exceeds Threshold limit. What if Turnover is 10 crores or more in one FY for example 2011-12 And then in subsequent FYs T/o is below 10 Crores what is the liability regarding T-2? Once the dealer becomes liable he shall have to file T-2 for all times to come. Even if T/o in subsequent FY is below 10 Cro...

IT : Long-term capital loss of sale of equity shares attracting STT is allowed to be set off against long term capital gain on sale of land in accordance with section 70(3)

IT : Long-term capital loss of sale of equity shares attracting STT is allowed to be set off against long term capital gain on sale of land in accordance with section 70(3) • Section 10(38) excludes in expressed terms only the income arising from transfer of Long term capital asset being equity share or equity fund which is chargeable to STT and not entire source of income from capital gains arising from transfer of shares. • It does not lead to exclusion of computation of capital gain of Long term capital asset or Short term capital asset being shares. • Accordingly, Long term capital loss on sale of shares would be allowed to be set off against Long term capital gain on sale of land in accordance with section 70(3). ■■■ [2015] 58 taxmann.com 115 (Mumbai - Trib.) IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH 'D' Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND Amit Shukla, JUDICIAL MEM...