Skip to main content

Income Tax - Demands not recoverable if Intimation u/s 143(1) not served


         
CBDT Instructions on Identification of Unserved intimations under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act for cases processed prior to 31.03.2010-Reg.

The CBDT has issued Instruction No. 04/2013 dated 05.07.2013  with regard to the directive issued by the Delhi High Court in Court on Its Own Motion vs. UOI 352 ITR 273

  •      that the demand should not be enforced in cases
  •      where no intimation u/s 143(1) was sent
  •      by the field authorities in respect of returns
  •      which were processed prior to 31.03.2010.
Which means that if a demand was raised prior to 31.03.2010 and the intimation u/s 143(1) was not sent to the assessee, then such a demand can not be enforced by the department.
It is also important to note here that the onus to show that the order was communicated and was served on the assessee is on the Revenue and not upon the assessee.

Directions have been issued to the Assessing Officers to strictly followed while dealing with such matters and compliance within the time frame

FULL COPY OF INSTRUCTION



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBDT Instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014

Dear Members,   The Hon'ble CBDT has issued Instruction No 5/2014 dated  10.07.2014 , by which the monetary limits for filing appeals to ITAT / HIGH COURT / SUPREME COURT have been revised.   The New limits are:                                  Tax effect Appeal before ITAT                                Rs.  4,00,000/- High Court                                               Rs. 10,00,000/- Supreme Court                                        Rs. 25,00,000/-   Copy of Instruction is attached for your information.

S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines

Crystal Phosphates Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines  For AY 2006-07, the assessee filed a ROI declaring income of Rs. 3.97 crore. ·          The case was selected for scrutiny under clause 2(v)(b) of the Scrutiny Guidelines issued by the CBDT. ·          The said clause of the Scrutiny Guidelines provided that a case had to be selected for compulsory scrutiny if an addition/ disallowance of Rs. 5 lacs or more was pending in appeal before the CIT(A) and such identical issue also originated in the year under consideration. The assessee claimed that as this condition stipulated in the Scrutiny Guidelines was not satisfied, the AO had no jurisdiction to select the case for scrutiny . The AO & CIT(A) rejected the claim . On appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal, HELD allowing the appeal : The CBDT’s instructions ...

GST - Electronic invoicing (E Invoicing) made mandatory

E-invoice has been made mandatory for taxpayers having turnover exceeding 10 crores from 1st October, 2022: Notification 17/2022 Central Tax dtd 01/08/2022 It implies that any registered person whose aggregate turnover in any preceding financial year from FY 2017-18 onwards has exceeded Rs 10 Crore shall issue E-invoice w.e.f 1st October 2022 . -- CA Yashu Goel 9899263490 M/s N.K. Goel & Bros. Chartered Accountants www.TaxingNarad.COM