Mumbai ITAT allows set-off of long-term capital loss arising from sale of STT paid equity shares

June 12, 2015[2015] 58 taxmann.com 115 (Mumbai - Trib.)

IT : Long-term capital loss of sale of equity shares attracting STT is allowed to be set off against long term capital gain on sale of land in accordance with section 70(3)

• Section 10(38) excludes in expressed terms only the income arising from transfer of Long term capital asset being equity share or equity fund which is chargeable to STT and not entire source of income from capital gains arising from transfer of shares.

• It does not lead to exclusion of computation of capital gain of Long term capital asset or Short term capital asset being shares.

• Accordingly, Long term capital loss on sale of shares would be allowed to be set off against Long term capital gain on sale of land in accordance with section 70(3).

M/s N.K. Goel & Bros.
cayashugoel.blogspot.com

Chartered Accountants
CA Yashu Goel
9899263490

Comments

CBDT Instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014

Dear Members, The Hon'ble CBDT has issued Instruction No 5/2014 dated 10.07.2014 , by which the monetary limits for filing appeals to ITAT / HIGH COURT / SUPREME COURT have been revised. The New limits are: Tax effect Appeal before ITAT Rs. 4,00,000/- High Court Rs. 10,00,000/- Supreme Court Rs. 25,00,000/- Copy of Instruction is attached for your information.

GST - Electronic invoicing (E Invoicing) made mandatory

E-invoice has been made mandatory for taxpayers having turnover exceeding 10 crores from 1st October, 2022: Notification 17/2022 Central Tax dtd 01/08/2022 It implies that any registered person whose aggregate turnover in any preceding financial year from FY 2017-18 onwards has exceeded Rs 10 Crore shall issue E-invoice w.e.f 1st October 2022 . -- CA Yashu Goel 9899263490 M/s N.K. Goel & Bros. Chartered Accountants www.TaxingNarad.COM

S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines

Crystal Phosphates Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) S. 143(3) assessment void if case picked up contrary to CBDT’s Scrutiny Guidelines For AY 2006-07, the assessee filed a ROI declaring income of Rs. 3.97 crore. · The case was selected for scrutiny under clause 2(v)(b) of the Scrutiny Guidelines issued by the CBDT. · The said clause of the Scrutiny Guidelines provided that a case had to be selected for compulsory scrutiny if an addition/ disallowance of Rs. 5 lacs or more was pending in appeal before the CIT(A) and such identical issue also originated in the year under consideration. The assessee claimed that as this condition stipulated in the Scrutiny Guidelines was not satisfied, the AO had no jurisdiction to select the case for scrutiny . The AO & CIT(A) rejected the claim . On appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal, HELD allowing the appeal : The CBDT’s instructions ...

N K GOEL AND BROS.

Search This Blog